Nintendo Switch w/NOK 5G21 Gateway

It basically boils down to an infrastructure problem TMO needs to fix on the other side of the modem first, and then updating the modem's firmware to properly enable/allow port forwarding to work.

EDIT: forgive me for the length of this post... it is a bit of a sore spot in the community, for obvious reasons like what you are experiencing.

The TLDR--gaming and IoT devices were NOT considered when they cobbled this service together.  It is really only designed for some of the most casual of users out there.  Unfortunately, the marketing and even their own reps do not make this distinction up front.  You MIGHT be able to get around some issues IF you can use a VPN with what you are doing... but success is limited due to issues with how things are managed.

Their network is IPv6 only.  Way too many devices and applications are designed with IPv4 with port assignments in mind.  While you can still assign ports with v6 addresses, the bigger problem is the reliance on v4 addressing.  You can't just "send" v4 addresses over v6 networks--the packets have to be altered on both ends of the v6 network for that network to carry the data back and forth to another v4 client (ie: some games trying to communicate with it's server via UDP protocol and v4 addressing).

TMO opted for an implementation of XLAT464 to handle the dual stack scenario that does not work for the peer-to-peer communication that many of these devices/applications depend on to function properly. While it works to get mostly all "stateful" v4 communications back and forth (you request outbound TCPIP connections that are established/tracked so they can transmit back to you), the "stateless" ones are broken. 

These are the types of connections that are not tracked at all... often UDP and not TCPIP, or otherwise inbound and unsolicited (you did not open a connection to them first--they are trying to reach out to you directly). These typically need a routing rule to forward such inbound traffic to a specific device, be that filtering by specific ports (set manually or via UPnP feature) or a DMZ rule that forwards all untracked/unassigned traffic to a particular device.

In theory, we should be able to get away with a DMZ rule on their modem to get around it--but their 464 implementation breaks things because of how they are filtering/shaping traffic.  It is behaving more like a "public" free VPN, or Carrier Grade NAT.  These can cause the public IP address to actually be used for multiple private users, so there is no 1 to 1 public address that can be paired to your modem or router's private IP in the usual fashion that would allow those peer communications to work properly. 

Communications MUST be initiated from your end first, and then the other end has to follow specific rules to reach back to you through that same connection for it to make sure it gets back to you properly.

Some have managed to get around it somewhat with a paid VPN service... but to get it work for things like game consoles it will require a VPN to run on your own router, which may narrow (or even void) your options considerably depending on specifics of your router.

And then there is the issue of the extra encapsulation for their 464 translation layer.  They have to use more space in the packet headers for their encapsulation, which reduces how much user data can go in each packet.  Instead of the more common 1500 byte client side MTU that leaves a 1460 byte MSS for user data, things get reduced to a 1420 MTU for the client, leaving only 1380 bytes for user data.  Some VPN's reduce this down to 1320 or less by default to avoid potential issues with their encapsulation--but not all of them.  So some are having issues getting VPN's to work properly... and not all allow the user to override the MTU or MSS values to fix it.

Basically... a LOT of people are getting hosed because TMO didn't have a clue of how people more often use their internet these days.  They are set up more for the extremely casual user... at best, a Netflix streamer and social media user.  Avid gamers certainly were NOT a consideration for this product... Heck, even the more casual gamer that likes the odd FPS game can get screwed by this system.

/endrant

So is that just it? 
 

If you have T-Mobile 5G internet. You can’t play most games online with Nintendo switch?

Can confirm this is an issue using the Nokia gateway provided by T-mobile. I’ve been trying to get a switch connected but it will not no matter what I do.

I have to use my iPhone 12 hot spot to play switch online. Please explain this to me? T-mobile needs to get their engineers working with Nokia to engage these most basic of hardware features that are needed. 

How were you able to rename the bands? I have no idea what I'm doing here. We moved very far away from my family and I'm trying to help my son be able to connect with my little brothers for gaming on the switch. NAT type D here with the internet and A on their end. I don't get any of this it's way above my understanding. I'm on the Tmobile internet app trying to figure out the rename to see if it helps.

I also have a fix. Go to your local T-Mobile store and ask for the new KVD21 home internet gateway. I swapped my out today with the new KVD21 and we can play Splatoon and Rocket League again!!!! 

And this one gets a better signal (4 bars instead of 3) in the exact same spot as our old one.

PAY ATTENTION PEOPLE, I HAVE SOLVED THE ISSUE---at a price of 30$

When I first got my TMOBILE tower, MarioKart online worked fine...then it didn’t.

Two months of trying everything left me with a NAT type D and an inability to connect.

SOLUTION THAT WORKED:

Ordered from Amazon, an official Nintendo “Wired Internet LAN adapter”

The weak spot on the Switch seems to be that it is wireless without an ethernet plug in.  This adapter allows ethernet to be plugged in through the USB.

Instantly up to NAT type B and racing my heart out.

Did not even have to institute plan B which was to use this product AND kick everybody else off of the connection.

Still pissed at T-Mobile for making me sinking hours into solving an issue that should have never existed, but glad to be on the other side of this.

This solution is perfect for those that are not tech savy and are intimidated by the talk of VPNs.

I switched to the KVD21 gateway yesterday but it did not solve the problem for us.  We are having issues with Fall Guys on the switch.  

Turns out that we have to power cycle our KVD21 gateway for the switch to achieve a NAT type B. But even after that we get dropped from Animal Crossing online play after around 10 minutes. After that, testing our internet connection on the switch reveals that were back to a NAT type D. So, not very useful. Sorry for the false hope. I thought we had it figured out.

@t-mobile this is a HUGE PROBLEM and you need to be upfront about it when your selling this crap 

Too late :(  Oh well. Looks like a VPN is the only solution. Question is, do I need the dedicated IP, or is the VPN enough?

I have the NOK 5G21 system and have no issues playing Xbox online. I am trying to play Nintendo online now and get into a lobby. I never had issues with xbox so I figured Nintendo would work too. I am trying to see if there was a fix for Nintendo online game play.

I just got the Nokia modem/router over a week ago. I had the same issue with Mario kart. Then a few days ago, my modem received some OTA firmware update that fixed the issue. When it check the NAT on the Switch it is on B instead of D. I have been able to successfully join online races for the past few days without any issues. For me, at least, it looks like everything is working as a home internet connection is expected to work. I think I will be keeping this and saving $70 bucks over my cable internet. sorry, Comcast.